The bar chart represents the percentage of men and women in Australia in 2010, divided into six age groups who performed physical activity on regular basis.
It is obvious, that overall percentage of women had been higher than men. However, in the youngest age group men exceeded percentage of women who had trained regularly in 2010, and the oldest group shown almost same results for both gender groups.
The men age group 15 to 24 was the most active age group with 52.8 per cent, when age group 35 to 44 was the lowest one with 39,5 per cent respectively. Across the all other groups of men trends were very similar. The women had been peaking in age group 45 to 54 with 53.3 per cent, but group 55 to 64 had a result little bit lower of 53 per cent respectively.
There is clear from the data showed, that gaps between men and women raised in mid-age groups, where difference was about twelve per cent. However two age groups showed opposite results. In the group 15-24, men was more fit than women with 52.8 per cent, when women had only 47.7 per cent respectively. In the age group over 65 years, both different sex groups showed very similar results with 46.7 per cent for men and 47.1 per cent for women.
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales (in various formats) of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011. 89
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003-2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000, and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The tables and pie chart show in percentage terms of the results of a survey of a new shopping complex in Auckland, New Zealand. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...r cent, but group 55 to 64 had a result little bit lower of 53 per cent respectively. T...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50900900901 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18620732673 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545045045045 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1104500095 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.1 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37269969695 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185942583062 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119372754773 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297293817921 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127696110438 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.