This bar chart illustrates the amount spend for roads and transportation by different contries like Italy, Portugal, uk and USA from 1990 to 2005
Overall, ltaly and portugal dropped more money for roads and transportation facilities, whereas, uk and USA spend less funds for above mentioned amenities.
Firstly, Italy used almost 23% for the improvement of roads and transportation in 1990.and in 2000 it increased slightly to 24%. But in 1995 and 2005 government decreased the funds to 20% and 18 %. In contrary, portugal was contributed 23% in initial period. Later, followed three years this nation gently decreased their funds to almost 23%, 22%and 20% in respective periods.
However, initially uk paid nearly 10% for above mentioned improvement. After five years the percentage was steadily fell into 8% in 2000.later, this contries government showed a little interest to roads and transport development. They used up about 13% of amount in 2005.again declined the profit to around 7%. On the other hand, USA,,'s contributions was near 12% and 10% in 1990 and 1995.later there was gradual incrementon 2000 and 2005 as 15% and 20%
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: binita karki
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
This bar chart illustrates the amount sp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Portugal, uk and USA from 1990 to 2005 Overall, ltaly and portugal dropped more...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 122, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun funds is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...n facilities, whereas, uk and USA spend less funds for above mentioned amenities. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s funds for above mentioned amenities. Firstly, Italy used almost 23% for the i...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed slightly to 24%. But in 1995 and 2005 government decreased the funds to 20% an...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...23%, 22%and 20% in respective periods. However, initially uk paid nearly 10% fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and transport development. They used up about 13% of amount in 2005.again decli...
^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ort development. They used up about 13% of amount in 2005.again declined the pro...
^^
Line 4, column 344, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...fit to around 7%. On the other hand, USA,,s contributions was near 12% and 10% in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22950819672 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93260285396 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.6719332104 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325602077094 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113319690246 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924507410507 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188874545432 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671878681252 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.