The bar chart depicts the ratio of 5 different age groups of people who are living alone in the USA between 1850 to 2000.
Overall, it seems that the percentage in all the age groups over this period has been increased gradually. However, it started with very less numbers, but the highest proportion ended up with 55-64 age group.
In 1880, only three age groups are given. The group of 37-46 and 47-54 years were reported just 2% citizens, whereas, 55-64 years group seemed slightly up at 3% poplulation. In 1900, it is updated with a one more age group, which was 27-36 years old, started with 2% people. There was a minor increase in the age group of 47-54 years old and 55-64 years old, 3% and 4% respectively. Percentage of living alone remained stable at 55-64 years category.
In 1950, 55-64-years group increased dramatically by 9% who were staying alone in the USA. The year 2000 then saw a rise in the proportions, with the percentage of the 55-64 years old almost doubling to 17%. While 5% of the 17-26 group lived alone. Age group 27-36, 37-46 and 47-54 were also risen up with 8%, 7% and 13% respectively.
- THE GRAPH SHOWS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN THE US AND JAPAN BETWEEN MARCH 1993 AND MARCH 1999 89
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the US from 1850 to 2000 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun numbers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...radually. However, it started with very less numbers, but the highest proportion end...
^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...but the highest proportion ended up with 55-64 age group. In 1880, only three ...
^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...55-64 years old almost doubling to 17%. While 5% of the 17-26 group lived alone. Age ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61691542289 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4266267968 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572139303483 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1449620517 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.3333333333 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261064537303 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12419597961 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117709761649 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228988849792 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158389858027 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.