The bar chart illustrates data on the changes in the rate of the young generation who took part in higher education in various regions in three years, namely 2000, 2005 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the figure for all nations increased every five years, with a notable exception of country B. Additionally, country D showed the greatest tendency to attract the youth joining higher education throughout the observed period.
More specifically, country D experienced the highest proportion of the young generation in tertiary education, with a rate of 60% in 2000, rising substantially by 20% in a decade. Meanwhile, despite starting at the lowest rate of only over one-third in 2000, the figure for country A witnessed a gradual growth to roughly under 60% in 2010.
The percentage of youngsters taking part in higher education in country B and C accounted for 40% and a half in 2000, respectively. Their figures, however, saw little differences of approximately 2% over the rest of the research period.
- The use of social media is replacing face to face contact with many people Does the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 91
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 61
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 78
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagrams below show the results of a survey from Taiwan explaining how students wanting to study overseas chose a university from 1998 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% over the rest of the research period.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11976047904 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97875152799 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604790419162 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.307769695 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0637954014016 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0285356486288 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389424077633 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0432218428261 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413385939404 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.