The bar chart below shows the percentage of people who are able to read and write in the different regions of the world and the world average in 2004.
Given is the graph illustrating the proportion of literal people in 7 worldwide regions compared to the world average in 2004.
It is clear that the number of men who had literacy in region 6 was the highest. By contrast, women in region 2 were the category receiving the least expenditure.
To embark on, region 6 was the category having the largest men who are able to read and write, at about 70%, while, the figure for world average, region 5 and region 7 was significantly lower, at 65%. However, the rest of the regions did not have the percentage which was over 60%, especially, region 4 made up the smallest proportion, at 47%.
For region 6, the proportion of women having knowledge was also highest among 8 areas, at 63%. World average accounted for 57%, at the same time, 41%, 43%, 45% were the category for region 1, region 4, region 5, and region 6 respectively. The figure for region 2 was the lowest, at only 38%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-02 | mifas meleraroth | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the results of a questionnaire showing how many times teenagers in Australia use an iPod in a week to play videos in 2009 68
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 92
- The diagrams below present the estimates and projections of world population from the US Census Bureau 51
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world? 73
- The diagram below shows the nitrogen cycle 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tegory receiving the least expenditure. To embark on, region 6 was the category ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59523809524 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60033902377 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577380952381 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.228808485 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25686015556 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121423076213 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842638816479 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175715469525 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658220015496 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.