The given bar chart illustrates the proportion of male and female students who were successful in their high school competency examinations in seven different subjects between the year 2010 and 2011.
Overall, it can be seen generally that girls outperformed the boys in almost all the subjects except geography. Furthermore, it is clear that the performance of the boys was in mathematics while the that or girls was computer science.
The female students did best in computer science with a 56.3% pass rate when compared to their male counterparts with a 42.2% pass. Girls performed slightly better than boys in mathematics at 49.2% respectively. Similarly, the female did a little better than the male in foreign language (include French, German, and Spanish) with the boys at 0.6% lower than the girls at 46.8%. Geography recorded at 20.1% for girls at their lowest pass rate compared to other subjects.
Chemistry was the boys' weakest subject recorded at14.1% while the girls' outstanding performance stood at 30.2%. The other subjects (history and physics) had pass rates of 36.7% to34.7% for physics and 25.6% to 22.9% for history for both boys and girls respectively.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.*includes French, German and Spanish 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'boys the weakest'.
Suggestion: boys the weakest
...to other subjects. Chemistry was the boys weakest subject recorded at14.1% while the girl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23157894737 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7182363518 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3609256345 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180426359839 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737801746553 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921454179641 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122690644425 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116552346773 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.