The chart compares seven different subjects in terms of the gender distribution of students successfully completing the high school capability test in the period 2010 - 2011.
Overall, female students surpassed their male counterparts in most area of study, making an exception of Geography.
Turning to the detail, 56.3% of girls passed Computing Science exams, compared to 42.1% of boys. Similarly, 16.1% more girls than boys achieved the Chemistry competency examination. The number of female students gaining achievement in Physics accounted for 25.6% of girls, while that of boys occupied 22.9%. An equivalent gap was observed in History, in which there was 25.6% of women and 22.9% of men succeeding in the test. The percentage of girls and boys relatively equally presented in Mathematics and Language results with a marginal difference, of merely 0.8% and 0.6% respectively.
Conversely, male students were better in Geography than female ones. Approximately a third of boys accomplished Geography exams, which was 10.3% higher than the recorded number of girls.
- The table below shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.*includes French, German and Spanish 56
- The charts below compare five different countries showing the electricity used measured in megawatts or mw in a typical hospital during one week and also the number of emergency medical calls made by local residents during the same week The last chart sho 94
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 74
- Some commentators feel that grandparents should live together with their children and grandchildren, while others say that elderly people should be encouraged to live independently.Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach yo 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, similarly, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 144.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61111111111 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.46410161514 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94092449085 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.680555555556 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0160461642 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7777777778 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181202098796 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658269774447 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084701952946 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117114102961 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105073747509 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.