The bar chart illustrates the outcomes of a questionnaire with regard to working productivity’s contributions in two aged groups. Overall, the young were in favor of opportunities while older ones were most concerned about salary.
Between two aged groups, it is possible to say that workers aged 18-30 were significantly affected by chances for self-development, while the most striking motivation for 45-60 aging people was money. Promotion prospects ranked second for the youth, followed by a relaxed working environment, both at around 70%. For the elderly, security at work had the least impact, at only 20% approximately.
A similar pattern was repeated in the working environment and team spirit for both groups. Nonetheless, unity was as twice essential as conditions of working, comparatively at 60% and 30%. Other factors contributing to work performance like a competent boss, colleagues’ respect or job satisfaction were quite similar in two participated groups. However, while young workers were more likely to be encouraged by the fulfillment of working, older workers' greater stimulations were a competent boss and courtesy between co-workers.
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show the changes that have been taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighbouring town since 1962 73
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart shows the results of a survey about the most important inventions in the last 300 years 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nonetheless, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 141.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63120567376 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.44591672665 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32384344013 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.702127659574 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7149703279 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176749631737 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782914042939 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577932832735 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140101303917 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483946878523 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.