The bar chart illustrates the outcomes of a questionnaire with regard to working productivity’s contributions in two aged groups. Overall, the young were in favor of opportunities while older ones were most concerned about salary.
Between two aged groups, it is possible to say that workers aged 18-30 were significantly affected by chances for self-development, while the most striking motivation for 45-60 aging people was money. Promotion prospects ranked second for the youth, followed by a relaxed working environment, both at around 70%. For the elderly, security at work had the least impact, at only 20% approximately.
A similar pattern was repeated in the working environment and team spirit for both groups. Nonetheless, unity was as twice essential as conditions of working, comparatively at 60% and 30%. Other factors contributing to work performance like a competent boss, colleagues’ respect or job satisfaction were quite similar in two participated groups. However, while young workers were more likely to be encouraged by the fulfillment of working, older workers' greater stimulations were a competent boss and courtesy between co-workers.
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 84
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance. 56
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show the changes that have been taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighbouring town since 1962 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nonetheless, second, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67613636364 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45177352157 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653409090909 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7212748109 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185007168934 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770054802717 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614151718504 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125267356686 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447376335511 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.