The bar graph provides information regarding using and producing of electric energy among top ten states in the year 2014.
As bar chart shows, the highest rate of production and consumption of energy was related to China, followed by the united states as the second rank among all 10 countries. While the differences of figures between two former countries were close, there was a noticeable drop (from 4099 to 1057 in production and from 3866 to 1038 in consumption) by moving from the United states figures to Russia. Furthermore, by going through the 8 remained states, it is obvious that there was approximately a smooth decreasing trend among them, starting from Russia at the level of 1057 billion kWh in production with 1038 kWh in consumption, and ending in the Korea. Rep at the minimum level of using energy (449.5) and producing it (485.1). Furthermore, most of the countries had more production rate in contrast with the consumption rate, and the only exceptions were Germany using more energy than producing it and also the Korea. Rep. That the both statistics were comparable.
To conclude, it is obvious that regardless of China and the United States, other countries have reasonable energy statistics and the trends of countries are that the production is almost less than consumption among most of them.
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 61
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the inforamtion by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is obvious that there was approximately a smooth decreasing trend among them, st...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04566210046 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74652125341 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511415525114 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.8549618003 43.030603864 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.857142857 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148785308348 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736688769715 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520460404206 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121755607931 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404642446962 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.