The bar graph illustrates the production and consumption of energy by 10 different countries in the year 2014.
Overall, it is clearly seen that China and the United States produced and consumed more electricity than any other countries. In addition, it can be seen that, in Germany the consumption of energy was higher than production.
To begin, in 2014 around 5000 billion kwh of energy was produced and consumed in China, whereas, in the US around 3000 billion kwh of electricity was consumed from the 4000 billion kwh of power generated. In the third place was Russia, with production and consumption at around 1000 billion kwh.
The lowest figures in the top ten was seen in Korea with generation and usage at about 400 billion kwh, which was about half of the fourth placed country Japan. In the 7th and 8th place France and Brazil produced and consumed similar amount of power at around 550 billion kwh for production and 450 billion kwh for consumption. The production of electricity in India and consumption in Canada was almost similar at approximately 600 billion kwh. Finally, Germany produced only 526.6 billion kwh o power, but it consumed 581.5 billion kwh.
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows the results of a 20 year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- IELTS Task 1 Tables give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
- Some people argue that the fittest and strongest individuals and teams can achieve the greatest success in sports But other people think that success is much related to mental attitude Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ermany produced only 526.6 billion kwh o power, but it consumed 581.5 billion kwh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, third, whereas, in addition, in the third place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97474747475 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65864361639 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510101010101 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8985931011 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.444444444 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120677252648 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707358440167 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521492830805 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939347909765 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527055794185 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.