The bar chart represents data of the ten leading countries for generation and utilization of electricity in 2014.
Overall, China and united states were leaders in both production and consumption of electricity with huge difference in comparison to other countries in 2014.In contrast to Korea, Rep which had lower figures among other nations at the same year. In addition, all top nations produced enough electricity so that their productions were slightly further than their usages except Germany which used more electricity than its output.
China had higher amount of generation and utilization about 5,398 and 5,322 billion kWh respectively, followed by the United States with 4,099 billion kWh produced and 3,866 billion kWh used.
Russia, Japan and India occupied positions three, four and five in the top ten, with respect to generation figures [ranging between 1,057 and 871 billion kWh] and corresponding utilization figures [ranging from 1,038 to just under 700 billion kWh]. The final five places in the list were occupied (in descending order) by Canada, France, Brazil, Germany and the Korea, Rep at the bottom of list.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- Do you agree or disagree with this sentence:It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than to learn facts 70
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 10
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Do you agree or disagree computer games is waste of time and children should not be allowed to play 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...n comparison to other countries in 2014.In contrast to Korea, Rep which had lower ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34078212291 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6532372539 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0761879349 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.333333333 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147714108385 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858310240253 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852181987302 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107653719047 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971612080005 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.