These bar charts depict the amount of electricity generated and used by ten countries in 2014. Overall, we can see that China led for both utilization and consumption of electricity, while Korea Rep was at the last place.
As the bar chart suggests, China was in the first place for both production and consumption, with amount of 5398 billion kWh and 5322 billion kWh. Following China, there was United States that generated and used not slightly different amount of electricity, at 4099 billion kWh and 3866 billion kWh, respectively. Other countries than China and United States did not produce and consumed electricity as many as they did. Russia, which was on the 3rd place, only generated 1057 billion kWh electricity and used 1038 billion kWh electricity. The amount did not even reach a half of United States' production and consumption. After Russia, there were Japan and India with the utilization and usage amount 936.2 billion kWh and 856.7 for Japan, and 871 billion kWh and 698.8 billion kWh for India.
Following India was Canada, which utilized and used electricity at 618.9 billion kWh and 499.9 billion kWh, respectively. The next countries with similar amount of electricity production and consumption were France, Brazil, and Germany. France and utilized 561.2 billion kWh electricity and consumed 462.9 billion kWh electricity, while Brazil produced and consumed slightly different amount of electricity, at 530.7 billion kWh and 455.8 billion kWh, respectively. However, Germany was the only country that consumed electricity more than generated it, with amount 582.5 billion kWh, and 526.6 billion kWh, respectively. At the last place was Korea Rep, with the amount of electricity produced as much as 485.1 billion kWh and usage amount as much as 449.5 billion kWh.
- the two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 11
Please give comment. I'm
Please give comment. I'm stuck at band 6.0. Thank you. God bless you
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 6.8 368% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 965.302439024 156% => OK
No of words: 287.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25087108014 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71768515904 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.418118466899 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3134995183 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.583333333 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0967828620015 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646739787141 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538313687222 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108784528013 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599693382855 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.