Bar chart : calorie source for UK males at different life periods.
The figure elucidates the number of calorie source for the UK males at different periods. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable ranges occurred for the amount of calorie source from pulses, and it is measured in the percentage of total intake from 0-24 years old males, 25-49 years old males and over 50 years old males.
To begin with, the amount of the intake from dairy for 0-24, which was at just above four-tenths, is higher rather than 25-49 and over 50, which made up at well beneath a third. Furthermore, according to pulse, there was a dramatic range for the number of calorie intake from pulses in which 25-49 has supplied the lowest intake of the calories in comparing to 0-24 and over 50, which approximately constituted at just below a fifth and well beyond 6 in 10 respectively.
In accordance with the other two aspects, the total calorie source of meat for 0-24 and over 50 is lower rather than 25-49, which constituted at a half. In contrast, vegetables experienced a different pattern in which all three aspects solely had well under a quarter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- Children today are too dependent on computer and electronic entertainment. It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional pastime than spending all day indoors. 78
- The bar chart show the number of enrolments for several institution. 73
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it 77
- The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25-year period from 1980 to 2005. 73
- Line graph : channel one news viewing figures. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'welled'.
Suggestion: welled
...n in which all three aspects solely had well under a quarter.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, third, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73157894737 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55200209276 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.2493664689 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.833333333 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 5.23603664747 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263529725 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181557903049 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178905185567 0.0843802449381 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194522080848 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921855662222 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.