The bar chart compares the changes in the places where people used to surf the Internet in the years 1998, 2000, 2002, and 2004.
The diagram presents variation on the percentages of places where UK citizens used the Internet between 1998 and 2004.
It is clear that home is the most popular place for interviewees to go online in each year. Meanwhile, the percentage of people who surf the Internet at their workplace witnessed a declining trend while the figures for college and library fluctuated within the period shown.
According the bar chart, in 1998, 52% of UK residents surfed the internet at home, which was almost doubled the figure for the second most common place where people went online, workplaces. Over the following 6 years, the percentage of home reached its lowest point at 46% and then slowly rose back to 56% at the end of 2004, whereas work gradually lost its popularity. By 2004, it become the least common place for people to use the network.
The other two common places where UK citizens used the Internet between 1998 and 2004 were college and library. People who went online at college constituted a quarter of the total interviewees and this figure remained steady until 2002. With regards of library, its percentage saw a fluctuation at between 10% and 15%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-10 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | rakholiyadivyesh50@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-29 | Ajantha J | view | |
| 2020-08-29 | ChanChan97 | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-27 | Hường Nguyễn8 | 44 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950 2002 with projections to 2050 89
- The pie charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950 2002 with projections to 2050 78
- The charts below show the result of surveys asking undergraduates and postgraduates why they choose Vaster university 78
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What forms do they take Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phone 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
...dually lost its popularity. By 2004, it become the least common place for people to us...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93401015228 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50869291828 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593908629442 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6200555584 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32041630417 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141499467647 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101929507722 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207523137519 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580873456903 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.