The bar chart compares consumer spending on six different items in Germany, Italy, France and
Britain.
The bar chart illustrates information about the amount of money which was spent on 4 categories of items in Germany, Italy, France, and Britain.
Overall, it is immediately obvious that British people spent considerably more money than people in the others on all six goods. Another interesting point is that in all countries, the amount of money spending on photographic film in all country is the highest.
People in Britain spent just over 170000 pounds on photographic film, which is the highest point of the whole graph. By contrast, Germans spending was the lowest on all items, reaching around 150000 pounds for each of the 6 products.
The figure for spending on toys was the same in both France and Italy, at nearly 160000 pounds. However, while spending on CDs and Photographic film in France was higher than that in Italy, the figure for Italian spending on personal stereos, tennis racquets, and perfumes was more than French. The amount of money which was spent on tennis racquets in France, around 145000 pounds, is the lowest figure shown on the chart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-19 | Aster astreani | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, busor train between 1970 and 2030. 73
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 42
- The table below highlights data on the number of travellers using three major British airports between 1998 and 2003 86
- The bar chart compares consumer spending on six different items in Germany Italy France and Britain 61
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, busor train between 1970 and 2030. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98333333333 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51854234738 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3127069529 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175277044079 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795813147115 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694064527271 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111080581859 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779014040487 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.