The Bar Chart shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union.
The Pie Chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport.
The bar chart gives information about CO2 discharges from six forms of transport in the European Union. The pie chart compares the proportion of European Union funds in investment for eight forms of transportation.
Overall, it is clear that the amount of CO2 emissions in the air is the most, while the highest funds are spent for roads and railways.
Looking at the first graph, air pollution that contains the largest amount of CO2 eruptions, with approximately 370 grammes per passenger-km. Passenger cars are the next largest producers discharging close to 140 grammes CO2 per passenger - km. In contrast, the remaining forms of transportation such as Buses, Rail, Maritime and Coaches are the reason causing around 50 grammes CO2 per passenger - km.
Regarding the second chart, it is notable that the European Union spends the highest fund for roads, with 52% compared with 31% of funds invested in railways. Reversely, there is only 10% of money spent on public transport and a minor percent of funds (1%) devoted to ports, intermodal, inland water, airports and unknown forms of transport.
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. 73
- In June 1996 an experimental flu vaccine was trialled in a large country town on females only Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000 84
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Inte 81
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, regarding, second, so, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16759776536 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81240976169 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9432273494 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369030264456 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170377262021 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12672904235 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237413539049 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162366153488 0.0819641961636 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.