The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The given barchart depicts how many couples that failed in marriage in Finland and Sweden between 2011 and 2015.
What's stand out from the graph is that the proportion of divorce in both 2 nations experienced a gradual variation over the period shown. Meanwhile, most of the separation in love in Sweden happened in 2012. By contrast, in that year mentioned, the percentage of divorced couples in Finland made up the lowest percentage.
From 2011 to 2012, the ratio of ended love in Sweden declined minimally, by around 4%. Whilst, the figure for that in Finland surged from 41% to about 48% in 2012. The changes was occured in the next 2 years when there was a slight fall in the rate of Sweden's broken loves, which considered an opposite trend for Finland's divorces, with the highest figure in 2014, at about 45%.
Specially, the number of failure in love during last year of the given stage in Filand witnessed almost the same percentage. In addition, people decided to broke up in Finland was less than the Swedish did over 4 years start. Nevertheless, the divorce rates in Finland surpass edthat in Sweden in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | Nowshin Tabassum | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ililmaidatuz | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | anthao42@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-09 | anthao42@gmail.com | view |
- ggggg
- The Barchart below demonstrates the various types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2010 Summarize the facts by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 78
- The graph below shows electricity production in terawatt hours in France between 1980 and 2012 Summarize the inforation by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The Barchart below demonstrates the various types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...nd and Sweden between 2011 and 2015. Whats stand out from the graph is that the pr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[5]
Message: You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
...m 41% to about 48% in 2012. The changes was occured in the next 2 years when there ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
nevertheless, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78974358974 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46679993243 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594871794872 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5192546822 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0906690180003 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401080226999 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355737373531 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0568602111423 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00634978606419 0.0819641961636 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.