The bar chart illustrates the proportions of the couples who divorced between 2011 and 2015 in two different countries.
Overall, the figure for divorces in Sweden decreased gradually while there was an slightly upward trend in this period. In addition, the percentage of Sweden couples divorcing was higher than that of Finland couples, with notable exception in the year 2015.
In the 2011-2012 period, divorce rate in Sweden went up slightly, approximately 5% and reached the peak by 50%. In the remainder of years, there was a gradual decline in Sweden, about 10%. In the year 2015, the percentage of divorces in Sweden is lowest, nearly 37%.
From 2011 to 2012, below 40% of people divorced in Sweden while it was over 30% in Finland. In the following years, the rate of divorces in Finland went up a little bit, about 5% and remained over 40% in the 2014-2015. The figures of divorces in two separate countries were mostly the same, which was not beyond 10%. In the year 2012, there was a large distance between the rate of divorces in two European countries, below 20% and the rate of Sweden couples accounted for largest proportion. However, they were similar figure in both countries from 2014 to 2015, under 6%.
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015. 73
- In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown intheir local area. As a result, much of the food people eat today has to come fromother regions. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh thedisadvantages? 61
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...den decreased gradually while there was an slightly upward trend in this period. I...
^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...imately 5% and reached the peak by 50%. In the remainder of years, there was a gra...
^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...a gradual decline in Sweden, about 10%. In the year 2015, the percentage of divorc...
^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...e rate of divorces in Finland went up a little bit, about 5% and remained over 40% in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84285714286 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52699260188 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.679476925 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4545454545 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353857776582 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137858979792 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829399754255 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222760722844 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110915253429 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.