The bar chart shows the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instrument (violin, guitar, piano, drums) in 2005, 2010, 2015.
The given bar charts illustrate an investigation of the passion of undergraduate children for four different musical instruments. This survey is investigated once every 5 years, starting with the year 2005.
Overall, Guitar and piano were recognized to be popular musical instruments and had a tendency of increasing the number of attendants during the three-time line while the proportion of school children learning to play drums or violin was lower than.
Beginning with the year 2005, the proportion of undergraduate children pursuing piano was around one-tenth, this figure was pretty similar to that of those who enjoy the guitar. In the five-year following survey, both these proportions were increased as twice as than the previous one while 20% was observed in the number of piano players and lower than a fifth for guitar passioners. Guitar has surpassed piano to become the most fascinating musical instrument with a high percentage (40%) while piano ranked the second position with around 37 percent. This data was supplied by an investigation that occurred in 2015.
Drums weren’t considered as attractive musical instruments with the data supplied during three-timelines. In 2005, There was only 5% in the scale of school children studying these instruments, and these figures seemed to stay unchanged in 2010. Until 2015, the number of drum players was increasing but not significantly (7-8%). In contrast, the trendline of violin players witnessed a slight decline during this time. This percentage was around 10% (2005), gradually decreasing, and only obtained 5% in the year 2015
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-23 | 0935670471 | 84 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of school children learning to play four different musical instrument violin guitar piano drums in 2005 2010 2015 84
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry 84
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The diagram shows how plate glass and bottle glass are made 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3625498008 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94316355491 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561752988048 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0642932297 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3387574529 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114713003334 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072712764547 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208841550068 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422002359617 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.