The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003, and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph demonstrates the proportion of the world citizen in 4 different nations, namely, China, India, USA and Japan, in 1950, 2003 and the estimated number for 2050.
Overall, India and China have the highest population in our world. It is shown that number of world populace trends were expected to be decreasing in three countries. However, India shows the contrast in the graph trend which was estimated to be increasing over the period shown.
In 1950, China, which illustrated as the world biggest population, was recorded for its population at around 23% while India was accounted for about 15 percent of the world popularity. In contrast, USA showed only 7% and less than 5% of the earth citizen was in Japan. Over the 52-year period, India has shown slightly increase, whilst China has demonstrated a markedly decrease and the rest has declined.
In 2050, Indian residents are estimated to rise contributively to approximately 23 percent which will take China place for the world biggest popularity. On the contrary, China is projected to have a fall to 15% follows by Japan to only 2%, whereas, the rate of global citizen being American is forecasted to remain stable at 5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | view | |
| 2021-06-08 | gur1040894 | view | |
| 2020-09-09 | Karamjeet11 | view | |
| 2020-07-30 | tangerinelinlin | view | |
| 2020-07-30 | tangerinelinlin | view |
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In many countries international tourism has become an important source of income However it also has negative effects Do the benefits of international tourism outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Nowadays international tourism is the biggest industry in the world Unfortunately it creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('markedly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...increase, whilst China has demonstrated a markedly decrease and the rest has declined. In 2050, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...all to 15% follows by Japan to only 2%. Whereas, the rate of global citizen being Ameri...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, whereas, while, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71779322245 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7318989981 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145946843481 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594403535127 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527350577843 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103300307097 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403024206217 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.