The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates how many point four football team have in four different seasons in the period of 4 years from 2002 to 2005.

Overall, team B was a best team since they was always by far the highest scores of all sectors in all four seasons.

A glance at the chart provided reveals something that other teams were difficult to jump in the first, which means they did not have more points than team B even team A nearly reached the highest point of team B in 2004 with 35 points. Therefore it was not surprising to see that team B was dominant, including the highest scores in all four seasons which was 72 points higher than that of the second highest points from team C. Certainly, team A bottomed at 5 points in that period, becoming the lowest scores in all seasons. Sadly, expecting team A stood at last place with the lowest points, team C also had that position with same point that performed very bad at season 2005.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-28 Thang Tran 73 view
2020-01-16 cindycornelia98 61 view
2020-01-16 cindycornelia98 67 view
2020-01-16 cindycornelia98 61 view
2020-01-16 cindycornelia98 61 view
Essays by user lordwind :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...om 2002 to 2005. Overall, team B was a best team since they was always by far ...
^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...point of team B in 2004 with 35 points. Therefore it was not surprising to see that team ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, therefore

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4450867052 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21796660394 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543352601156 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.8603125138 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17984055379 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111591874688 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442298546114 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150287705915 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261452575698 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.