The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in how many points that three teams gained in four consecutive seasons, starting at 2002.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that team B was always the leading team with highest number of points obtained annually. Meanwhile, there were huge gaps between it and those two teams, with the notable exception for team A in 2004.
More specifically, despite starting at highest figure of 82 points, team B experienced a dramatic fall of nearly 40 points after three consecutive years. However, it still remained it top position with 55 points compared to only 8 points and 5 points for team A and team C in the final researched season respectively. The opposite trend was witnessed by team A and team C with the effort to gain more points as possible.
Furthermore, in spite of sitting at the bottom out of the three teams, team A showed a great effort to gain the second highest points with 35 points which was three-fold larger than that of team C in 2004. Whereas, the number of points obtained by team C reached its peak at 15 points in 2003, but it gradually decreased and finished at third place with only 5 points which less than 3 points compared to that of team A in 2005.
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015. 84
- Do you believe that experimentation on animals for scientific purposes is justified Are there any alternatives to animal experimentation 84
- Some people say that the most important thing for being rich is people have opportunity for helping other person ? Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 53
- The table below gives information about the values NZ of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...that team B was always the leading team with highest number of points obtained annually. Mea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tops'?
Suggestion: tops
...ve years. However, it still remained it top position with 55 points compared to onl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, still, third, whereas, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55249672011 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528888888889 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2037944592 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.375 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101650189766 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612081218852 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392179736078 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085406007611 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419517376826 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.