The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in how many points that three teams gained in four consecutive seasons, starting at 2002.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that team B was always the leading team with highest number of points obtained annually. Meanwhile, there were huge gaps between it and those two teams, with the notable exception for team A in 2004.
More specifically, despite starting at highest figure of 82 points, team B experienced a dramatic fall of nearly 40 points after three consecutive years. However, it still remained it top position with 55 points compared to only 8 points and 5 points for team A and team C in the final researched season respectively. The opposite trend was witnessed by team A and team C with the effort to gain more points as possible.
Furthermore, in spite of sitting at the bottom out of the three teams, team A showed a great effort to gain the second highest points with 35 points which was three-fold larger than that of team C in 2004. Whereas, the number of points obtained by team C reached its peak at 15 points in 2003, but it gradually decreased and finished at third place with only 5 points which less than 3 points compared to that of team A in 2005.
- The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant 42
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 Summarise the main character and make comparison where relevant 78
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 78
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK citiy between 1989 and 2009 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...that team B was always the leading team with highest number of points obtained annually. Mea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tops'?
Suggestion: tops
...ve years. However, it still remained it top position with 55 points compared to onl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, still, third, whereas, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55249672011 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528888888889 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2037944592 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.375 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101650189766 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612081218852 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392179736078 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085406007611 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419517376826 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.