The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the necessary daily amount of fruit and vegetable consumption for men, women and children in 2002, 2006, and 2010.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that women consumed a great deal of fruit and vegetable, whereas children consumed the least among the others.
In particular, the amount of fruit and vegetable consumed by children was less than half of that of by men and women in 2002. A sharp growth was seen for all categories and reached their peaks at 26%, 32%, and 18% for male, female, and kids respectively in the next four years. However, these figures experienced a downward trend with a drop of 2% for both men and children consumption in 2010. Meanwhile, the female daily consumption of fruit and vegetable reduced to 26% which was roughly equal to its initial figure, and was 10% higher than that of children.
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 67
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 80
- The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 89
- the flow chart below show the procedure to get the driving license in US 73
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, whereas, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7898089172 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5339753904 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.1404036543 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23777652193 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128950135336 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103989901621 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181382758618 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795220931136 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.