There are some assumptions argue that students intend to open their horizons by the innovation of internet or television compared to teachers in classroom. This essay agrees with that suggestion solely because knowledge will be recorded daily by technology and has the easily accessible ability, whereas teachers could only be met during classes at school. This essay will first discuss about the opened-source of information help students study flexibly outside books, and then talk about its function as a handy tool of gathering knowledge.
Internet is widely considered as an informative opened-source of knowledge by most of students. Job market these days involving strict requirements needed to obtain to get a well-paid job. Teachers or lecturers in schools or universities, however, are unable to acknowledge all necessary skills needed for a real-experienced job. Therefore, students have their intentions of learning free online courses to obtain more knowledge. It is surveyed by 83% of employers in Britain show their satisfactions of hiring graduated students who achieve time management skill. And 78% of them learned by themselves from reliable websites such as TedTalks, Edx, Coursara and so on.
It is also demonstrated as a useful knowledge-gained tool compared to traditional methods from teachers. Due to intensive working or studying, people are bustling to go to any classrooms, therefore they have a tendency of attending online course at home to gain further knowledge. The vast majority of knowledge has been gathered on the Internet daily, so all ones have to do is clicking mouse and explore any knowledge of the world. 76% of Vietnamese students has reported recently to experience new important skills with flexible free courses opened weekly that they had not been taught at schools but are essentially important to secure future jobs like time management, personal money management, programming python, economics and so on.
In conclusion, this essay supports the idea of the superior function of gaining knowledge from other sources like internet or television compared to that of teachers due to its wide range of information and flexibility.
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 73
- Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer Do you agree or disagree 84
- The line graph shows the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001 73
- The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the students') or simply say ''most students''.
Suggestion: most of the students; most students
...formative opened-source of knowledge by most of students. Job market these days involving strict...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Job) must be used with a third-person verb: 'markets'.
Suggestion: markets
...e of knowledge by most of students. Job market these days involving strict requirement...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to free'
Suggestion: to free
...dents have their intentions of learning free online courses to obtain more knowledge...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44476744186 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05779548644 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598837209302 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3168659222 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.785714286 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142819314134 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493322875925 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429939093551 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933886442634 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320357716318 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.