"Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources (internet or television), To what extent do you agree or disagree?"
The dominance of the Internet technology has brought about drastic changes in almost every aspect of our life, including education. While some people argue that teachers remain the most important factor contributing to student achievement, I am more convinced that students can gain more knowledge through novel learning sources such as the Internet or television.
To start with, regarded as the global data warehouse, the Internet offers an inordinate amount of knowledge for just about every subject known to man, ranging from arts, history to archeology and astronomy, the lists is simply endless. Thanks to the usefulness of the information available, motivated self-learners can access a wealth of material straight from respectable university sources. Realistically, one can probably find almost anything he wishes to know on the World wide web. Whereas, rigid school curriculum is likely to keep students from realizing their great individual potential. In fact, the needs and learning styles of each student are so varied that a standardized curriculum won’t work.
On the other hand, supporters of traditional learning environment would argue that the presence of qualified teachers is of paramount importance in helping students acquire knowledge in a systematic way. However, there is mounting evidence that students are becoming alienated and bored by traditional teaching methods. In stark contrast, digital learning tools help every student learn at the best pace and path for them. The opportunity to customize learning sequences for each student will make education more productive. Moreover, by incorporating both visual and audio contents, online learning would provide a more engaging and dynamic experience for students of all ages. Eventually, better engagement would lead to productivity and improved motivation.
In conclusion, with the advent of the world wide web, teachers are no longer the only guidance for students. Self-motivated learners can obtain far more from online resources, and customize the materials to fit their interest and learning style.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Thang Tran | 89 | view |
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 73
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, notpeople. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 84
- The shown pie charts illustrate data about distribution of the amount of the water on 4 various targets in the given countries. 78
- The news media have become too much influence in people lives todayand this is a negative development? To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative social development? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e wishes to know on the World wide web. Whereas, rigid school curriculum is likely to k...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a systematic way" with adverb for "systematic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e in helping students acquire knowledge in a systematic way. However, there is mounting evidence th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to style'
Suggestion: to style
...ials to fit their interest and learning style.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69108280255 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94662410469 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640127388535 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4861383283 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.133333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170953859071 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514253559631 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415083226786 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105757794526 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242876976239 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.