The table illustrates data on the changes in the expenditure on technology given to developing countries from global charities, over five consecutive years, starting from 2006.
Overall, it is clear that the overall financial contribution of these regions increased throughout the observed period. Additionally, the figure for America was far exceedingly higher than that of the remaining nations.
Looking at the table in more detail highlights the fact that the US had the largest amount of money spent on technology in order to assist developing regions, with 9.7 billion US dollars in 2006, rising substantially to roughly $23 billion dollars in 2010. Meanwhile, the total expenditure also experienced a two-fold increase, between 15.7 and 30 billion US dollars in 2006 and 2010 respectively.
European countries and other areas, however, accounted for a smaller contribution of expense on technology, compared to America, with 3.3 and 2.7 billion US dollars, accordingly in 2006. In addition, their figures grew slightly over the research period, reaching around three to four billion dollars in 2010.
- The plans show a school library 5 years ago and the same library now 78
- People drinks more and more sugar based drinks What is the reason for tgat What can be done for that 89
- Some animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea What are the reason What solution to solve them 95
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56470588235 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99847712212 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658823529412 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2830227008 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.142857143 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30181599283 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113963573154 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107761818846 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161383202687 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110594759608 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.