The graphs show below the post school qualifications held by Australians in the age groups 25 to 34 and 55 to 69.

The two pie charts compare and contrast data on the differences in the percentage of the Australian higher education qualifications of two age categories 25 to 34 and 55 to 69.

An overview at the diagrams show that the Australian postgraduate students aged from 25 to 34 and 55 to 69 had less interest in veterinary, agriculture, architecture and law.

More specifically, the younger age group turned more attention to the social sciences and arts fields which were accounted for the highest percentage with nearly one-fifth of 357,500 Australians. In the other group, most of them also achieving a degree in the same area with 20.42% of the total of 104,800 students. The same situation happened in the education criterion for the younger and older group with 14.76% and 13.17% respectively. The tendency of studying in pure science, maths, information technology was drastically reduced by age. The percentage of elderly postgraduate students in these fields was fell to 10.11% which was half than that of their younger counterparts. A further point to note is that medicine was only accounted for 7.40% of the 25 to 34 group compared to roughly 12% of the other group.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hnology was drastically reduced by age. The percentage of elderly postgraduate stud...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04615384615 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01023456944 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3600786396 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258107387301 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10408795364 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980399558321 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209263263436 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072538418503 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.