Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about the true purpose of studying in university. However, whether a university should give rise to upgrade job-related skills and knowledge or focus on the fundamental knowledge fot its own sake has caused heated debate. From my point of view, I believe that job-related skills and knowledge should be considered as one of the essential factors to find a future job.
To begin with, it is obvious that most students graduating from university are keen on searching for a suitable career for their own sake, so receiving practical knowledge and skills from university education enables them to become highly competitive in the job market. This is because most of them, after getting a bachelor's degree from the university, will enter the workplace, earn a living and support their own families. University, therefore, has to give top priority to future potential customers.
In addition, concentrating on job-related skills could gain a great benefit the university itself. For instance, graduated students could directly enter the job market without any further training from the company employers, which costs less time and money, so they are able to use most of their university education to skillfully dedicate themselves into the job. And foremost, that would increase the educational university reputation and become a highly well-known place training skillful workforces.
On second thought, pure science and knowledge also play a fundamental role in the advancement of job-related skills. There are, of course, a small number of students keen on the basic original knowledge, and they will later become scientists who will make enormous contributions to our society. However, these people far less than others.
In conclusion, the major function of university should be providing most students with job-related skills, guaranteeing high rate of employment and thus making the economic society wealthy. Likewise, we should not overlook the other crucial roles universities undertaking.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams illustrate the design of a single and a double room study area 73
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 89
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...b-related skills. There are, of course, a small number of students keen on the basic original kno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, likewise, look, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53968253968 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94322526421 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8938852429 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.642857143 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307481899925 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10188950749 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852187506322 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16909123434 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867735583868 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.