The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons

The graph compares the results of teams A, B and C in terms of four different seasons from 2002 to 2005. It is measured by points.
Overall, it can be seen that there was a significant fluctuation about the scores between three groups. But the team B had the highest score over the period 3 years.
At the beginning of the period, in 2002, the score of team A reached the highest points of nearly 85 points. The figures for team C was 10 points, at least twice as high as those for team C at the same time. There were a dramatic increase in the points of both A and C team, accounted for 11 and 15 points respectively, while team B dropped by around 22 points in 2003.

In 2004, there biggest change was seen in the score of A team that team A reached a peak at 34 poitns before hitting a free fall to 8 points in 2005. The points of B team was 43 points by 2004, after going up to 55 points at the end of the period. This figures for team C rose in both the period of 2004 and 2005, with 12 points and 5 points respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-10 nobitaa 78 view
2024-11-10 nobitaa 78 view
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp view
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp view
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp view
Essays by user BangLangTim :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ps. But the team B had the highest score over the period 3 years. At the beginni...
^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'there the biggest'.
Suggestion: there the biggest
...y around 22 points in 2003. In 2004, there biggest change was seen in the score of A team ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, at least

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.02926829268 4.92477711251 82% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29312917297 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521951219512 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4998630134 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207362055071 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100403455865 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797171298532 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153941794531 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529244457487 0.0819641961636 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 93.48 61.2550243902 153% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.09 11.4140731707 53% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.32 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.