The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news by age group 2011

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news, by age group 2011.

The given chart reveals information about 3 forms of media (social networking, microblogging, and radio) utilized by people of various ages to obtain their daily news in the year 2011.
The graph makes it quite apparent that radio topped the list of the popular media types in the given year, while microblogging seemed to be the least appealing. Furthermore, social networking declined steadily in popularity among older age groups.
Radio ranked first among all age groups in 2011, with the exception of adolescents (10-17). Apparently, radio showed its prevalence with 90% of listeners between 18 and 29 years old and 85% aged 30-49. Radio maintained its appeal as the most preferred media type, despite a slight decline in the number of listeners in the 50+ age group. In the given year, despite holding the same figure with 80% of users in adolescents (10-17) and young adults (18-29), social networking halved in group aged 30-49 and was down to 26% in the group over 65.
Microblogging, the final media category, received the least attention of all types. It attracted 20% to 30% of citizens in the younger age groups, but just 10% or less of seniors used it.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp view
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp view
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp view
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp view
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp 89 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ked first among all age groups in 2011, with the exception of adolescents 10-17. Apparently, radio sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d was down to 26% in the group over 65. Microblogging, the final media category,...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, furthermore, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91878172589 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62220944534 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639593908629 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4544223914 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277733954788 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108118541431 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664468112009 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153468223318 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752462494735 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.