The bar chart demonstrates how much time the teacher used to teach their students in different standards of schools in four particular countries in 2001.
Overall, whats stands out from the graph is that in every country the higher the levels of schools, the teaching hours also increased. Among the four countries, the USA's teachers spent more time teaching their students, while the Japanese teachers had been passed less time to teach than all others.
Regarding Japan and the USA, in 2001 the US's primary teachers taught around 150 hours more compared with the rest of the three countries. Japan and Iceland utilized 600 and approximately 595 hours respectively, while Spain used 650 hours in the whole year to instruct their pupils. Moreover, the teachers of the USA gave 1000 hours to the lower secondary pupils. In the case of the other three countries the range between 600 to 750 hours.
Turning to upper secondary, Japanese teachers gave the least amount of time among the four countries which were 700 hours. On the other hand, almost 1200 hours the scholars had been got from their instructors in the USA in 2001. Spain and Iceland had spent around 900 hours on this purpose.
- Some companies spend a lot of money on scientific research and use animals for testing Many argue that this is for a just cause while others say otherwise Do the advantages of using animals in research outweigh its disadvantages 82
- The environmental problems that today s world is facing are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation So governments and large organizations should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the envi 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 73
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas 11
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...particular countries in 2001. Overall, whats stands out from the graph is that in ev...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90594059406 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36244449786 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554455445545 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317306506286 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118489573106 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967885639751 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213488292991 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107526125066 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.