The bar graph below shows the active membership of private sector occupational pension scheme by benefit structure in the UK, 2007 to 2014.
The bar graph represents the millions of British people who are an active member of private occupational pension schemes from 2007 to 2014.
Overall, the number of pension scheme received for defined benefits reduced whereas the defined contribution number had increased. It is interesting to note that, the latter two consecutive years showed a drastic incremental trend.
In terms of defined benefits recorded at the highest of nearly 3 million British people for the memberships and this rate eventually dropped constantly and slowly until it reached at about 1.5 million membership numbers in 2012. From 2013 to 2014, the number of membership remained unchanged at about 1.3 million memberships for defined benefits.
In contrast to this declining trend, defined contribution had an incremental trend with active memberships. To begin with, this application had the lowest number of active members of nearly 1 million British people had assigned which grew slowly but always stayed at near to 1 million memberships. This continued to 2013 where the contribution membership rose to about 1.5 million memberships and this number skyrocketed to over 3 million memberships by 2014.
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 84
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison 73
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 61
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in two European countries since 2000 and predicted unemployment rates until 2020. 73
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree wit 41
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'whereas', 'in contrast', 'in contrast to', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.208121827411 0.268076937826 78% => OK
Verbs: 0.131979695431 0.116061578633 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10152284264 0.0759168565197 134% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0355329949239 0.0366838410393 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.010152284264 0.0131127313244 77% => OK
Prepositions: 0.157360406091 0.155750635184 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0355329949239 0.0379272487307 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90654186036 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0456852791878 0.0210936926555 217% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0913705583756 0.0948980150116 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0152284263959 0.00967000014798 157% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1186.0 1161.00487805 102% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.9 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.44565217391 5.90752243213 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73763899035 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.472826086957 0.337110787985 140% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.342391304348 0.247514529752 138% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.195652173913 0.171178102325 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146739130435 0.112407865282 131% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90654186036 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548913043478 0.546246751206 100% => OK
Word variations: 47.9000507299 49.3433353143 97% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0094962315 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.345344357 42.9750493124 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.25 135.714022679 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.0094962315 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.689975730869 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 57.2391304348 47.7609492067 120% => OK
Elegance: 2.25714285714 2.94281807926 77% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368054045782 0.418131533498 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.168226535276 0.181151798455 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.109995187675 0.0850326197045 129% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.733275875701 0.706616315825 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.143148598974 0.157042692854 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193382803288 0.228904883108 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106144912319 0.108899403657 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.280317736774 0.367819155151 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.101130098017 0.0812612215331 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273325913753 0.316326947829 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103028898895 0.0921553760075 112% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70731707317 216% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.08536585366 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 3.16585365854 253% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.02926829268 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.