The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the quantity of carbon ejections in various countries over a period of 3 years.
It can be seen that figures for carbon emissions fluctuated over the years, even though, the United States had the highest number overall. On the other hand, Canada and UK had the lowest number of emissions for the majority of the period.
As can be seen from the graph, the United States had the highest number of ejections in all 3 years and in 2005, the figure for this country was approximately 1600000 thousands metric tonnes. Chinas' trend rose steadily and in 2005 peaked at nearly 1500000 thousands metric tonnes.
The figures for the UK and Canada were almost stable over the years. Both of them had about 1800000 thousands metric tonnes. Looking to the figures of Germany and India, it can be concluded, that number of carbon emissions in Germany was stable in 1975 and 1990, whereas Indias' number rose steadily during the 3 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | AzizbekYuldahsev | 67 | view |
| 2018-11-08 | Fer | 60 | view |
| 2018-06-17 | Madhu081191aluri | 61 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 70
- Today, more and more people choose to live by themselves. What are the causes of this? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media forcommunicating information. State which you consider to be the most effective. • comics • books • radio • television • film • theatre 67
- What are the advantages and disadvantages for children watching television? 56
- The Internet has caused people to be isolated from their real lives.Do you agree or disagree? 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81707317073 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30752203493 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1521871334 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105004015777 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051241767947 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441409819559 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800133730268 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390263893333 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.