The bar chart illustrates the number of research students who are joined in 6 different subjects, namely Linguistics, Psychology, Natural science, Engineering, Mathematics, and Programming at a US University in 2011.
It is noticeable that the number of male students was dominated by 4 subjects out of 6. However, the only subject which female student is higher than male students was Linguistics.
Engineering, Programming, and Mathematics were favorable subjects among male students. Mathematics had the highest gap in quantity between male and female students about 160 students. Both Engineering and Programming had the same number for male students at 150 members, while female students were just under 90 members for both subjects.
Psychology and Natural Science were the most loved subjects for both genders. The number of males and females in natural science was the same at 200 members. Furthermore, Linguistics was the only subject which had a higher member of female students than male students at about 80 and 110 respectively.
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in UK 67
- Happiness is considered very important in life Why is it difficult to define What factors are important in achieving happiness 78
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48765432099 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03812210868 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4199932741 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7777777778 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366318358151 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168169972486 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590193209859 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2376884978 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290196668194 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.