The bar graph below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010.
The bar graph compares the changes in property prices in Algeria, China and Argentina from 2007 to 2010.
Overall, the growth of property prices in Algeria decreased significantly over the period given, while in China there was a dramatic increase. It is also noticeable that in Argentina the changes of property prices fluctuated.
In 2007, the rise of property prices in Algeria started at just over 6%, then it dropped every year to reach a low of less than half of its original number in 2010. In contrast, the changes in property prices in China began at 2% in 2007, after which the figure rose continuously to reach a peak of approximately 7% in the final year, which was the biggest percentage growth among other countries.
With regard to Argentina's property growth rate, at the beginning of the period, it was just over 3% and went up to about 5% in the following year. The figure dropped steeply to roughly 1.2% in 2009 before climbing to almost 2.3% in 2010.
- The diagrams below show the campus of Riversdale University in 1993 and in 2010 71
- The graphs below show the total production and sources of electricity in two countries in 1980 and 2000. 67
- The chart below displays the shares of expenditure on selected categories in the United States, Canada, the UK and Japan in 2009. 73
- The bar graph below show the numbers of university students who chose Italian as their primary subject from 1960 to 2000. 61
- The chart below shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79411764706 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56730170846 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0815633553 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253403903579 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12770497086 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735145127116 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175161798443 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751922517387 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.