The bar graph shows net national income (that's the income earned by the various factors of production in the economy, after the loss of used-up capital equipment has been accounted for) in per capita terms.
The bar graph illustrates the five different nations’ national income in USD per capita from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, all countries’ net national income per capita has risen and among all, France had the lowest national income per capita. The highest national income per capita was dedicated to the US whereas the national income per capita for the rest of countries reached about the similar level by 2010 except for France.
The US had the highest national income per capita in 1990 despite the income level was reached at about $28,000 per capita which increased substantially to more than $35,000 per capita by 2000. Meanwhile, the UK had about $22,000 national income per capita in 1990 which increased by about $4,000 per capita in 2000. By 2010, the US national income per capita remained at its dominant rate of about $36,000 income per capita whereas the UK increased its national income per capita to close to $28,000 by 2010.
In contrast, the rest of countries started at similar level of above $15,000 income per capita except for Germany which recorded at close to $20,000 income in 1990. Ten years later, the national income increased drastically where it reached at well over $20,000 income per capita for France and $25,000 per capita for Netherlands whereas German’s national income grew slightly just over $20,000 per capita. This incremental trend continued until 2010, Germany and Netherlands reached at similar income per capita of above $25,000 per capita whereas France reached at below $25,000 income per capita.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-21 | aremontika | 11 | view |
| 2016-09-12 | Monica1 | 56 | view |
| 2016-09-09 | hyangsu21@hanmail.net | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012. 73
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 56
- Many people choose to live alone. What do you think the advantages of living alone are and do they outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012 84
- Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM) crops. However, not enough is known about the effects of these crops on our health and on environment. Inferring with nature in this way should be prohi 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in USD per capita from 1990 to 2010. Overall, all countries' net nationa...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...milar level by 2010 except for France. The US had the highest national income p...
^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... capita in 1990 which increased by about ,000 per capita in 2000. By 2010, the US ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... per capita to close to 8,000 by 2010. In contrast, the rest of countries start...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'well', 'whereas', 'while', 'except for', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.258064516129 0.268076937826 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.0860215053763 0.116061578633 74% => OK
Adjectives: 0.089605734767 0.0759168565197 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0322580645161 0.0366838410393 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.010752688172 0.0131127313244 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.236559139785 0.155750635184 152% => OK
Participles: 0.0250896057348 0.0379272487307 66% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.42915524425 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0215053763441 0.0210936926555 102% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0681003584229 0.0948980150116 72% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0143369175627 0.00967000014798 148% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1534.0 1161.00487805 132% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.9 128% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06324110672 5.90752243213 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73763899035 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.395256916996 0.337110787985 117% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.229249011858 0.247514529752 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.142292490119 0.171178102325 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0790513833992 0.112407865282 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42915524425 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.371541501976 0.546246751206 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 33.6155432624 49.3433353143 68% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.1111111111 23.0094962315 122% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0406562382 42.9750493124 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.444444444 135.714022679 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 23.0094962315 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.689975730869 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.48048780488 270% => OK
Readability: 51.0360122969 47.7609492067 107% => OK
Elegance: 4.02777777778 2.94281807926 137% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446701034542 0.418131533498 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.370787612405 0.181151798455 205% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.143854200153 0.0850326197045 169% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.841903795466 0.706616315825 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0786925801697 0.157042692854 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.305218805243 0.228904883108 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957811964369 0.108899403657 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.549752977694 0.367819155151 149% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0920205371806 0.0812612215331 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.380033504507 0.316326947829 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746490602958 0.0921553760075 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70731707317 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.16585365854 190% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.