The map shows the proposal of two prospective sites for building a new shopping mall in Brandfield.
There are some similarities of both proposed sites (S1 and S2). Both places are surrounded by the main road, the railway, and the city centre. Moreover, they are almost equally close from the golf course and park area on the west. However, there are some differences of both locations.
S1 is easily accessible from the housing estate nearby in the north side. Furthermore, there is a river on the east which can be worth a view. However, this site is too far from the industrial estate area on the south east.
On the other hand, S2 is located very close from industrial estate which is an ideal choice to target industrial customers. However, the surrounding lacks of the river view, and there will be a long way from the residential area to access S2.
In summary, S1 is an ideal for the shopping mall site if the main customers will be people from the residential area. However, S2 will be the alternative choice for targeting customers from the industrial site. In addition, S1 will be expected to have a better view.
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 83
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area and two sites S1 and S2 have been proposed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 79
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73737373737 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60656952199 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7866357594 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.1538461538 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2307692308 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175201275976 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687949104186 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069672940404 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114830393022 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831277253815 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.62 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.