The best way for government to solve the traffic congestion in city is providing free public transport for 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Traffic congestion is the most important problem in many countries. Everyone is finding how to solve this problem. Many people argue that government should provide free public transport in 24 hours per day and 7 days a week. This can be a sound appropriation but to me personally, that way has some benefit and drawback for workers or residents.
When free public transport are used 24 hours per day and 7 days a week, it can reduce traffic congestion and air or noise pollution. Simply it is free for everyone so a lot of people will use it. It can help them to save their money for transfering. More and more people using public transport, it can decrease a large number of people in traffic at rush hours. That means air or noise pollution which is caused by traffic jams, will be reduced. It will create a green space outside and the fresh air. Everyone always likes that space.
Beside its benefits, that way has some drawback which can make the government or the workers feel unsatisfied. When free public transport are used 24 hours per day and 7 days a week, it can make workers who worker for public transport companies will feel tired. More and more people use public transport , that companies need more workers to do many works. it make the employers and the workers feel bored and stressed. As public transport is free for everybody so the government will spend a lot of money for paying salaries to workers. It can affect to the country's economic.
In addition, although using free public transport is a good way to reduce traffic congestion, it has some drawback. I think the government should encourage everyone to use public transport or walking. And we should think and aware about the important of reducing traffic congestion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-02 | hhongphucc | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...using public transport, it can decrease a large number of people in traffic at rush hours. That m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a worker'.
Suggestion: who is a worker
... and 7 days a week, it can make workers who worker for public transport companies will fee...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ore and more people use public transport , that companies need more workers to do ...
^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ies need more workers to do many works. it make the employers and the workers feel...
^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
... need more workers to do many works. it make the employers and the workers feel bore...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, i think, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 1.00243902439 1596% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 5.60731707317 428% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 305.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75081967213 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56849647922 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452459016393 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 431.1 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 1.53170731707 914% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5442391215 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.45 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.45 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 3.70975609756 350% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365581183522 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109239115883 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116057679686 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242810965717 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681105828194 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.