Birth rates in China and the USA
The line graph illustrates changes in the levels Birth rates in China and the USA from 1920 to 2000. Overall, it can be seen that, despite some fluctuations, over the period as a whole the levels of birth rates fall in all two countries.
In 1920, the number of birth rates in the USA was stood at 11. After that, 1920 to 1940 saw a fluctuation to 12 in the birth rates. Next, the number of birth rates plunged to a low of 4 in 1945. After that, increaseed dramatically to 15 in 1950. Next, it steadily fall for the following year, but then increased gradually to 8 and the end at 7. Beginning the period at just 10 in China. However, it rose dramatically to 15 in 1935, after that it dropped dramatically to 5. It remaine stable for the following years, but then there was sudden increase with the rate reaching a peak of 20 in 1950 and then China saw a more moderate falls at 4 over the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | phadode | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-13 | Zahid6400 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
- The graph below describe number of arrest per year for using illegal drugs between 1991 and 2005 77
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 73
- The two graphs compares that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that the number of coal natural gas and hydroelectric power remained stable in much the same proportions
- people getting married by different age group in one particular country between 1996s and 2008s. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'falls'?
Suggestion: falls
...ically to 15 in 1950. Next, it steadily fall for the following year, but then increa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 728.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.23255813953 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48069888441 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4420076734 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.8 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374634067065 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150231776105 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144971359841 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327453649833 0.15604864568 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555327965543 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.96 11.4140731707 61% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.