the changes made in a university office in 2005 and the current year.
The diagram illustrates the changes made in a university office in 2005 and the current year.
Overall, there are major changes in the north-east and south-west corners. The north-west area was untouched over the years. Similarly, the photocopy machine and file cabinets remained stable.
In 2005, The office is totally spilt into four divisions, near the entrance, the photocopy machine and file cabinets were placed in the right-side corner followed by a notice board and the armchair. Every room had the desks and cabinets.
In the current year, the room was large without a wall except for the room in north-west corner which remained unchanged in both the years. All the desks were combined and placed on the north-east side of the entrance. The notice board and the armchair was shifted to the left side along with a sofa and a table. A new water cooler and a coffee machine are installed near the immediate left of the entrance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The table illustrates the social and economic statistics for Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire in 1995 by the United Nations. 73
- People should choose their course of study not on the basis of their own interests, but based on the kinds of jobs they can get.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- People prefer to use internet for daily works such as texting and shopping instead of face-to-face communication. 61
- The bar chart illustrates data about the marriage and divorce rates from 1970 to 2000 and the marital status in 1970 and 2000 in the USA 42
- The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93081761006 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52562516714 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534591194969 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0001136362 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238464466595 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105673744702 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.234497537192 0.0843802449381 278% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243382213167 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.321433952982 0.0819641961636 392% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.