The chart and the table illustrate the Japanese population data over a one-hundred-year period.
Overall, according to the chart, the number of Japanese residents increases steadily in the past and the present but decreases in the future. By contrast, the table shows that the older population is growing and contributing more and more to the total population.
At the first glance at the chart, in 1950, the Japanese population was 84,1, these figures kept rising stably until reached the peak at 127,8 in 2005. In the last 45 years, the figures dropped slightly to 125,4 in 2015 and forecasted to experience a great decrease to 89,9 in 2055.
Coming to the table's data, in 1950, the number of the older residents was 4,1 million which accounted for 4,9 per cent of the total. In the 55 following years, the number surged to 25,7 million accounted for 20%. Then, the figures are expected to peak at 36,5 in 2055, contributing more than a fourth of the Japanese population.
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person in an Australian university 67
- Many people are working longer hours Why is this happening What problems can this cause to people 73
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tables'' or 'table's'?
Suggestion: tables'; table's
...ecrease to 89,9 in 2055. Coming to the tables data, in 1950, the number of the older ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8502994012 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69313332749 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544910179641 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.124293774 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.25 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104035131493 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461390577186 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319207583309 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721190337946 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274755632017 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.