The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of ages of the people in three 0-14 years (teenager), 15-59 years (adult), and 60+ years (elderly) groups in Italy and Yemen in 2000 and a prediction of these groups in 2050.
It is obvious that Italy had the majority of middle age people percentage in 2000 while in Yemen was less than half percent. By 2050 the middle age will decline in Italy lower than half and this percentage increase in Yemen. The adult group will not change a lot in Yemen.
As can be seen, by 2000 the half percent of the population in Yemen related to teenagers while in Italy this rate was less than a quarter. In Yemen, adults are located in second place with 46.3% and the last group was 3.6% in 2000, but in Italy, more than 60% adult range has the highest percentage and unfortunately elderly rate is nearly two quarters. Although Yemen’s teenager group is located in the first place, the forecasts show the percentage of teenagers will decrease to 37% and the other two groups rise in order to 57.3% and 5.7% in 2050. In contrast, the population of adults will drop to 46.2%, and the elderly people rate increase from 24.1% to 42.3%. The most important problem is the percent of teenagers in Italy in 2050.
As a result, the government of Italy should set roles to prevent this problem during these years.
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The most important aim of science should to be improve people s lives To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, while, in contrast, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5690376569 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30103460335 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489539748954 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2558594178 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156498880416 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749119263605 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038778662652 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100007558626 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427007250834 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.