The chart below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts depict the population distribution of Italy and Yemen in 2000 and predicted distribution for 2050.
In Yemen, it is clear that the majority of the population is composed of individuals between 15-59 years old in both 2000 and 2050. Meanwhile, the proportion of seniors (60+ years) remains remarkably low at around 3.6% in 2000 and is expected to remain stable by 2050. The youth population (0-14 years) accounted for more than half of the total population in Yemen in 2000, but is expected to decline by approximately 15% by 2050. This trend suggests that Yemen may experience a significant shift in its demographic makeup over the next few decades.
In contrast, Italy's population distribution in 2000 was characterized by a substantial proportion of adults (61.6%), followed by seniors (25%), and a relatively small proportion of youth (12.4%). However, by 2050, this distribution is expected to change dramatically, with seniors making up nearly 42.3% of the population. This significant increase in elderly population may have far-reaching implications for Italy's healthcare system, pension policies, and social services.
It is evident that Yemen will experience a relatively young population in 2050, while Italy will face an increasingly elderly population. This disparity highlights the need for Italy to develop policies to address its aging population and ensure its long-term sustainability.
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 73
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research that 61
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 3.97073170732 479% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48858447489 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16890371448 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547945205479 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.0344954777 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.2 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239452482122 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103081883022 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590388757455 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166397149832 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456665373602 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.