The given bar chart provides a comparison of the average weekly income allocated for disbursement by households in two specific years, 1968 and 2018.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the spending priority in 1968 went on food while the top belonged to expenditure for leisure aspect in 2018. The provided spending categories experienced both tendencies: one upward trend and the other downward trend whereas only household goods still remain stable in the 50-year period.
Initially observing at the upward group, there was a substantial increase comprising more than twice as much at the income expended for leisure aspect per week that reached a peak at the end of the period. Additionally, weekly salary for housing items made a near twofold jump, which accounted from 10 percent to approximate 20 percent during the interval. Furthermore, the share of average wage per week paid for transportation increased by roughly 7 percent as the former.
With regards to the remaining downward group, it is instantaneous that food demand plummeted from the precedence of families expenses (35 percent in 1968) to the third rank after a half century. Reversely, clothing and footwear and personal goods both caught a spectacular decrease as nearly two times as the former (about 5 percent and less, respectively). Following that, there was a minimal drop in expenditures on fuel and power, and the share of these three categories mostly came as the least preferred items in the statistic over the years shown.
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 89
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and ma 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, so, still, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21370967742 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8442229041 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.1680230835 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.666666667 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135379695872 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538910071159 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505151251712 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906855692889 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560249831688 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.