The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
The given diagram provides a comparison of the average weekly income allocated for disbursement by households in 1968 and 2018.
From an overall perspective, it is highlighted that the spending categories experienced both tendencies: one upward trend and the other downward trend. While most using goods experienced these trends, the household product has the same pattern after 50 years.
Taking a first look at the groups have a positive trend, 2018 the income using leisure items per week increased roughly more than 2 times when compared with the beginning and hosted the highest rank at the end of the period. Subsequently, weekly salary for housing products made a twofold jump over a 50-year period, which accounted from 10 percent in 1968 to 20 percent in 2018. Following that, the share of average wage per week used for transport grow by 7 percent as the former.
Moving to the groups experiencing a downward trend, the proportion of weekly income for food came as the first level at the beginning and down to the third rank at the end of a period, which decrease from 35 percent to 17 percent over the years shown. Finally, the latter percentage of fuel, power and personal good plummet as nearly two times as the former and the share of two categories came as the least preferred items in the statistic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-07 | Gracegracegraxe | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-07 | Gracegracegraxe | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-31 | meocatrinh | view | |
| 2022-07-31 | meocatrinh | view |
- Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone Do you agree or disagree 95
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 73
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 73
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, look, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6067566528 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591111111111 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.6444407117 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.25 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116905624739 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558161152198 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516863370353 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840399926346 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589682076013 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.