The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the news about the count of people using Social Networking sites in Canada for two years.
Overall, the number of subscribers using more than one site has had a surge when compared to the previous year.The percentage of humans not involving them self in any means of media has a slight decline in contrast to the earlier times.
Surprisingly, in 2014 the count of persons using one site was 36% which had a huge fall of 8% in 2015. The measure of the population who never indulge into any sort of networking sites had reduced by 1%. Expect these two none of them had experienced a reduction.
Interestingly, there has not been a dramatic difference in these periods. To the extent the rise has been about 2% when compared to the old times. The development starts with only 1% and ends with 2%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-23 | Shivam7090 | 84 | view |
2019-11-24 | Sagar Gurung | 78 | view |
2019-11-20 | phanduydat | 67 | view |
2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
- Computers are being used more and more in education.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion. 61
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
- The graph below shows the population for India and China since the year 2000 and predicts population growth until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Should wealthy nations be required to share theirwealth among poorer nations by providing such thingsas food and education? Or us it the responsibility ofthe governments of poorer nations to look after theircitizens themselves 56
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...urge when compared to the previous year.The percentage of humans not involving them...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in contrast, sort of, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 692.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7074829932 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60331879159 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.0009943092 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174058767132 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669683288999 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823417354346 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110300772082 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907363210849 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.