The chart below gives information about the percentage of the adult population who were overweight in four different countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
The bar chart compares the proportion of obese youngsters in four distinct nations in three years 1980, 1990 and 2000.
Overall, it is evident from the chart given that there was an upward trend in the ratio of overweight adults in all countries over the time period. Besides, whereas the rate of adults in the USA who were obese was by far the largest, that of their counterpart in Japan was considerably smaller.
In 1980, only about 2 per cent of Japanese young people were overweight, compared to qround 15 per cent of American adults. However, the percentage of Finland and Australia obese younger generation were half of that in America. After a decade, the figure for Japan adults remained relatively stable, while a substantial rise was observed in the proportion of those American adults sufferred obesity, at 23 per cent. On the other hand, the figures for the remaining countries rose marginally by 2 to 4 per cent.
In the last stage, the rate of obese adults in the USA continued to increase dramatically by 8 per cent. Similarly, Astralian and Finland overweight adult rates also went up significantly to 21 and 13 per cent, respectively. That of Japanese younger gerneration, in contrast, witnessed a mere increase by 1 per cent to solely 3 per cent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-12 | QUYNH2022 | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-21 | orga-anhanh | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-11 | azxx | 72 | view |
| 2018-10-14 | hanji | 64 | view |
| 2017-04-12 | kingnight153 | 72 | view |
- There are many zoos in the world. What are the benefits and drawbacks of keeping animals in zoos. 84
- Human have made a great technological process in the last hundred years. However, this progress have negative effects on people's lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communitites in poorer countries doing un paid work such as teaching and building houses. Why ? Who benefits more from this, the community or these young people? 84
- Some argue that all young children should be required to stay with full-time education until they are at least 18 years old. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87557603687 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80058484956 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.290872941 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202375906955 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823771852793 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536083511385 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131711507222 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542785984531 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.