The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.
The bar chart compares the proportions of the people of Singapore and Malaysia who hold qualification in science at various levels of education.
It seems from this bar diagram that both countries are roughly similar in terms of the number of their citizens having qualification in science at different academic levels except the number of bachelors in science degree who are more in Singapore than Malaysia.
In both countries, the largest percentage of people are those who do not have any qualification in sciences with almost similar proportion in Singapore and Malaysia at 60% and about 65% respectively. Similar situation exists for science education up to school level in both countries with Malaysia's having five percent more people in this group than Singapore (30%).
In contrast to this, Singapore has twenty percent of its people holding bachelor degree in science, which is twice of the corresponding proportion of Malaysia. Both countries have only five percent with master's degree in science.
It can be inferred from this bar chart that while Malaysian seems to have slight margin in terms of science education at school level, Singapore has more graduates in science than Malaysia.
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. 84
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries. 56
- some people spend alot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events is this goog thing or bad thing 46
- Children today are not as fit and healthy as in the past. Discuss the causes for this situation with relevant examples and give your opinion on possible solutions. 89
- You organized a party for a 90th birthday party in a hotel for a relative; many elderly guests attended this party which is of great success.Write a letter to thank the hotel manager. In your lettergive the details of the partythe reason why the party was 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.296875 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.772864035 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3766156223 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.285714286 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16653671569 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954673119459 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661010974082 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111657583316 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566364444793 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.