The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2000, *20.., and future projections for 2025.
The given chart illustrates the main exports in Southland in a 20-year period from 2000 to 2020 and future projections for 2025.
Overall, international tourism and dairy products have a higher number while the least common belongs to meat products.
As can be inferred from the bar chart, regarding the year 2000, international tourism has the greatest amount with over 8 billion. Coming in the next rank are dairy and meat products at approximately 7 billion and 6 billion, respectively.
Moving on to the information in 2020, it is clear that dairy products have the largest number with just under 10 billion. In contrast, meat products have the least remarkable number, at 5.5 billion. It is worth mentioning about the chart that there is a prediction on these industries for 2025. The quantity of international tourism will increase to 10 billion; meanwhile, dairy and meat products will witness a decline in the number of exports revenue by half a billion than in 2020.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-25 | monmon12345 | view | |
| 2021-12-21 | nganphuong05 | 82 | view |
| 2021-03-08 | elisabetta_fedele | 64 | view |
| 2021-01-23 | Nilufar0506 | view | |
| 2021-01-23 | kamilame | 73 | view |
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which do you think is a better educational system 92
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 73
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human s life Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 71
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04294478528 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84016614239 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9311230802 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187949189435 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098954145665 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14387918817 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145434563518 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169962227165 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04294478528 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84016614239 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9311230802 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187949189435 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098954145665 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14387918817 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145434563518 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169962227165 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.